John Podesta,
President Clinton’s former Chief of Staff
Remarks at a press conference sponsored by the SCI FI
Channel
Oct. 22, 2002 at the National Press Club
I thought I might start with the famous line by
Admiral Stockdale: “Who am I; what am I doing here?” Or maybe I should start
with who I am not: I’ve never been followed by a tractor beam; I’ve never been
bathed in the glow of a white light coming from the sky; I certainly have never
been taken; and while my obsession (which for some of you was well known while
I was in the White House) with the X Files earned me the title of First Fan, I
think I always understood the difference between fact and fiction. So I guess
you could call me a skeptic.
But I’m skeptical about many things, including the
notion that government always knows best, and that the people can’t be trusted
with the truth. That’s why I’ve dedicated three decades of my life, both in
private practice on the Senate Judiciary Committee and in my work at the White
House, to the fundamental principle of protecting openness in government. As
Harold Cross, the father of the Freedom of Information Act and a well-known
journalism professor at the University of Missouri, said, “The right to speak
and the right to print, without the right to know, are pretty empty.”
I believe that the notion of open government - the
fundamental tenets of the Freedom of Information Act - are really part and
parcel of our First Amendment rights. And I think it’s worth going back and
reminding you just exactly what those tenets really are that form the basis of
that Act: that disclosure is the general rule, not the exception; that all
individuals have equal right of access; that the burden is on the government to
justify the withholding of a document, not on the person requesting it; and
that individuals improperly denied access to documents have the right to seek
injunctive relief in the courts. That’s why I’m here today to add my voice to
Bonnie, Leslie, and Lee’s. I think it’s time to open the books on questions
that have remained in the dark; on the question of government investigations of
UFOs. It’s time to find out what the truth really is that’s out there. We ought
to do it because it’s right; we ought to do it because the American people quite
frankly can handle the truth; and we ought to do it because it’s the law.
Let me explain what I mean by that: in 1995 President
Clinton signed Executive Order 12958, which set tough standards for classifying
documents, and led to an unprecedented effort to declassify millions of pages
from our nation’s diplomatic and national security history. Before President
Clinton signed that executive order, a tiny minority of classified
documents—only 5%-- had a fixed classification date. Since the signing of that
order, more than 50% of those documents are now marked for declassification in
ten years or less. But even more significantly: during the five years that the
executive order was in place, its policies resulted in the declassification of
over 800 million pages of historically valuable records, with the prospect of
many hundreds of millions more pages to be declassified in the next few years.
To give you a bit of a comparison: in the previous fifteen years, the
government had declassified a total of 188 million pages. So I think that was a
singular accomplishment of the Clinton Administration. For future generations
our history books will rely on the information contained in those declassified
documents. Scholars, historians, journalists, everyday researchers around the
world (not just in the United States) will explore the past and help guide our
future.
But the work is not done: that order requires the
automatic declassification of records that are twenty-five years or older,
subject to a very narrow set of exceptions. And I want to note two of those:
one is that the automatic declassification rule doesn’t apply if it reveals the
identity of a confidential human source—and I underline the word human. And I
think that we’re not talking about that in the cases that ought to be looked
at, reviewed and declassified. The other is that they would seriously or
demonstrably undermine ongoing diplomatic activities of the United States. And
unless we have ongoing diplomatic activities with people who are extraterrestrials
that I am unaware of, I think that exception doesn’t apply either. So, there
are these cases in which documents haven’t been made available to the American
public. The American public is quite skeptical about the fact that the
government won’t make them available for public inspection. These are records
that are more than twenty-five years old. They ought to be declassified; they
ought to be released; and we ought to be able to see for ourselves what’s
included in them.
This morning, Dana Millbank’s story in the Washington
Post notes that our government does not always reveal the truth, the whole
truth and nothing but the truth, and that even the highest leaders of our
government don’t always tell the facts just as they are. That’s why freedom of
information is so important, and the information that is included in the
requests that we are discussing is so critical to be put in front of the
American public, so that they can make their own judgments about the conduct of
the program of investigation as well as the facts there that the Air Force and
others have discovered.
John Podesta, Former Clinton Chief Of Staff, To Join
Obama: Report
Posted: 12/09/2013 11:07 pm
EST | Updated: 12/10/2013 11:17 am EST
Read the full report
at The New York Times.
No comments:
Post a Comment