Connecting The Dots: Taking A Fresh Look At Pivotal Events In Our Nation's History
Comment engendered by the viewing The Disclosure Project page:
|(1) THE 1993 WTC BOMBING. The first World Trade Center bombing occurred on February 26, 1993, when a car bomb was detonated in the parking garage below the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York City. If the van had been parked a few feet closer to one of the pillars, it could have collapsed an entire tower of the Trade Center, killing tens of thousands.|
The 1,500 lb (680 kg) urea nitrate–hydrogen gas enhanced device was intended to knock the North Tower (Tower One) into the South Tower (Tower Two), bringing both towers down and killing thousands of people. It failed to do so, but it did kill six people and it injured 1,042.
The use of compressed gas cylinders in this type of attack closely resembles the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing 10 years earlier.Both of these attacks used compressed gas cylinders to create fuel-air and thermobaric bombs that release more energy than conventional high explosives. According to testimony in the bomb trial, only once before the 1993 attack had the FBI recorded a bomb that used urea nitrate.
The 1993 WTC bombing case was quickly cracked when Mohammad Salameh, one of the bombers, repeatedly went to the Ryder rental office in Jersey City and demanded that Ryder refund his $400 deposit for the van, which he claimed had been stolen.
What, you may ask yourself at this point, is wrong with this picture?.
The attack was said to have been planned by a group of conspirators including Ramzi Yousef, Mahmud Abouhalima, Mohammad Salameh, Nidal Ayyad, Abdul Rahman Yasin and Ahmad Ajaj. They received financing from Khaled Shaikh Mohammed, Yousef's uncle. In March 1994, four men were convicted of carrying out the bombing. In November 1997, two more were convicted.
|The Eglin Blast Effects Study concludes that; |
"It is impossible to ascribe the damage that occurred on April 19, 1995 to a single truck bomb containing 4,800 lbs. of ANFO. In fact, the maximum predicted damage to the floor panels of the Murrah Federal Building is equal to approximately 1% of the total floor area of the building. Furthermore, due to the lack of symmetrical damage pattern at the Murrah Building, it would be inconsistent with the results of the ETS test [number] one to state that all of the damage to the Murrah Building is the result of the truck bomb. The damage to the Murrah Federal Building is consistent with damage resulting from mechanically coupled devices placed locally within the structure.... It must be concluded that the damage at the Murrah Federal Building is not the result of the truck bomb itself, but rather due to other factors such as locally placed charges within the building itself.... The procedures used to cause the damage to the Murrah Building are therefore more involved and complex than simply parking a truck and leaving...."
Her name was Baylee. She died.
|(2) WORLD TRADE CENTER: False Flag Operation|
Remotely controlled planes, Directed Energy Weaponry, and pre-planted explosive materials used to assist with symmetrical collapses.
OFFICIAL STORY: Structural (pancake style) collapse of 3 buildings, resulting from two of the three buildings each having been hit by a commercial airliner. American Airlines Flight 11 struck Tower 1, and United Airlines Flight 175 struck Tower 2.
Officlal explanation; aviation fuel burned so hot it melted the steel infrastructure, triggering collapses of WTC 1 & 2, with related damage generating an eyebrow raising symmetrical collapse several hours later, of what appeared to be an only minimally damaged WTC 7.
Official explanation for destruction of WTC 4,5 & 6; (nine story office buildings) debris impact followed by fires that developed from debris. (Neither 4, 5 or 6 collapsed).
Building 7 was said to have collapsed due to office fires and what NIST calls “thermal expansion”.
The fourth hijacked plane was said to have been on its way to attack the White House or the U.S. Capitol Building in Washington DC, but crashed in Shanksville, PA when passengers tried to re-take the plane.
RESEARCH INDICATES: MULTIPLE Destruction causes; Remotely controlled planes ensured target accuracy and were employed to generate maximum panic, enhance dramatic effect, and disguise actual method of destruction. A combination of pre-planted traditional and exotic explosives appear to have been utilized. Government Star Wars program DEW (Directed Energy Weaponry) was primary cause of destruction. A directed-energy weapon (DEW) is a type of weapon that emits energy in an aimed direction without the means of a projectile. It transfers energy to a target for a desired effect. Multiple witnesses testified to explosions in building prior to planes hitting. Additional sequential explosions were caught on tape. Nano Thermite charges appear to have been used to assist and ensure symmetrical collapses. A number of steel beams have been smoothly and deliberately severed, consistent with the use of Nano Thermite. Fragments of Nano Thermite (aka "SuperThermite") were found in WTC rubble, formally announced by scientists (findings published in the respected Bentham Chemical Physics Journal).. With overhead photography of the site, there was also discovery of a series of largely empty holes, (no evidence of oversized falling debris having caused these). These footprints are said by scientists to be consistent with use of massive Directed Energy Weaponry beams.
The fourth plane's target was NOT Washington, D.C.
"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex.
The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted.
Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together."- President Dwight D. Eisenhower
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), hired multiple contractors to investigage the cause of the World Trade Center collapses, and to handle Ground Zero site cleanup.
Their findings formed the basis of the governnment's official explanation as to the collapses, which proposed that sagging floors pulled inward on the perimeter columns: "This led to the inward bowing of the perimeter columns and failure of the south face of WTC 1 and the east face of WTC 2, initiating the [implied pancake-style collapse ] of each of the towers."
When asked why NIST did not test for explosive residues, NIST spokesman Michael Newman responded thatNIST saw "no evidence saying to go that way."
In 2009, a group of scientists analyzed dust samples that had been collected by Manhattan residents after the collapse of the towers, and reported that approximately 0.1% of the dust by weight consisted of microscopic chips resembling active thermitic explosive material. One of the scientists suggested that it had been used to weaken the buildings' structures.
The following companies were hired by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Their reports formed the basis for the governnment's official explanation as to the collapses.
APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. (ARA), SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP.(SAIC), UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, INC., WISS, JANNEY, ELSTNER ASSOCIATES, INC. (WJE), ROLF JENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.(RJA), COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC., SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGER, INC. (SGH), SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL, LLP (SOM), GILSANZ MURRAY STEFICEK LLP (GMS), HUGHES ASSOCIATES, INC. (HA), ROSENWASSER/GROSSMAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.C., S. K. GHOSH ASSOCIATES, INC. (GA), TENG & ASSOCIATES, INC. (TA), AJMAL ABBASI, EDUARDO KAUSEL, DAVID PARKS, DAVID SHARP, JOSEF VAN DYCK, KASPAR WILLIAM, DANIELE VENEZANO, DATASOURCE, INC., GEOSTAATS, INC., NuSTATS
They are being sued.
Plaintiff is DR. JUDY WOOD on behalf of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Venue is UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK .
Lawsuit Synopsis: NIST hired these defendants with taxpayer money. The defendants defrauded the taxpayers. These contractors are part of what is known as the Military Industrial Complex. Several of them are major manufacturers and developers of energy weapons.
While the final minutes of Betty Ong's life ticked away, the official transcript indicated that American Airllines supervisor Marquis had dithered, asked staggeringly redundant questions of Ong, and continually reminded her that their conversation would have to be kept just between the two of them.
The aircraft crashed into WTC1, the North Tower of the World Trade Center at approx. 8:45 AM .
United Airlines Flight 175 was a scheduled U.S. domestic passenger flight from Logan International Airport in Boston, Massachusetts to Los Angeles International Airport, in California. The aircraft crashed into the WTC2, the South Tower of the World Trade Center at 9:03AM.
High rise design, engineering, and construction principles are much the same world-wide.The twin towers were not the first highrise structures ever to sustain significant damage from a fire. Nor were they the first steel-framed buildings to be struck by errant aircraft. Various buildings around the world, including the Empire State Building, have been hit by airplanes of various size.
And countless steel-framed buildings around the world have been hit by U.S.-launched cruise missiles and guided bombs. None of them have ever suffered a complete collapse from multiple impacts or fire, some, even after burning for nearly twenty hours.
Experts have offered no explanation for why the building known as #7 World Trade Center - a conventional steel-framed highrise structure that was not hit by a plane - became, at approximately 5:20 PM on September 11, 2001, the third highrise structure in recorded history to suffer a complete collapse due to fire. Built in 1985, it was a modern, 47-story structure that housed 1,868,000 square feet of commercial office space, much of it occupied by governmental agencies.
No “jet fuel”, no plane impact, no ruptured diesel fuel storage tanks, just a nearly symmetrical instantaneous failure of the entire core column structure allowing for a near-fall speed collapse of Building 7, neatly into it’s own foot-print… just like a controlled demolition. All because of sporadic office fires burning on a few “key” floors.
FEMA struggled to find an explanation to include in a report on the collapses, but came up short:“The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time.”
WTC 7 housed the New York offices of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the various investigations which were ongoing at that time. Enron, Global Crossing...lost files include documents that could show the relationship between Citigroup and the WorldCom bankruptcy. … all of these investigations, and many others, came to a sudden end, as crucial records were lost when Building 7 fell. All the files for approximately 3,000 to 4,000 SEC cases were destroyed. Some were backed up in other places, but many were not, especially those classified as confidential. Estimates are, over 10,000 cases will be affected.
The Secret Service had its largest field office, with more than 200 employees, in WTC 7 and also lost investigative files. Says one agent: “All the evidence that we stored at 7 World Trade, in all our cases, went down with the building.” The IRS and Department of Defense were also tenants, along with the CIA, which, it has been revealed, had a secret office in Building 7.
The collapse of Building 7 saved careers, kept many “insiders” out of jail, saved billions in fines and restitution, and added to the insurance payout to Silverstein Properties.
WHO BENEFITS FROM ATTACKS ON THE WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDINGS?
Military Industrial Complex
Corporations and individuals being investigated by SEC, IRS, Secret Service, CIA.
Bankers funding war declared as a direct result of attacks
Influential members of political party in power at time of attacks.
Project For New American Century (NeoCon world domination agenda)
Silverstein Properties, 4.55 billion dollars in insurance payouts plus $861 million for Bldg. 7, plus currently pending lawsuit.and....Hundreds of millions in gold and silver are mysteriously missing from vaults beneath WTC 4
Increasing the plausibility of precision automated control of the two aircraft striking the WTC, is the fact that each aircraft struck precisely the bottom regions of the only sections within each WTC tower only recently upgraded with thermal protection materials. This would suggest a clandestine relationship between the visually spectacular aircraft attacks upon the WTC and activity pre-September 11, 2001 within each WTC aircraft impact region, intended to initiate structural failure within these regions not generated by the aircraft attacks themselves and to contribute to an appearance of structural failures caused by each aircraft impact.
Floors 92 and above were re-fireproofed between 1995-2000 within WTC Building 1. WTC 1 was struck at floor 94 by AA 11.
Floors 77 and above were re-fireproofed between 1995-2000 within WTC Building 2. WTC 2 was struck at floor 78 by UA 175.
EXCERPTED FROM New York Observer- Article by Gail Sheehy - June 20, 2004
"... The briefing in New Jersey... attended by about 130 family members of victims, had been arranged by the F.B.I. Previously unavailable calls from passengers and crew were to be played for families of victims... Those present were told that the material they were hearing is evidence in the government's case against Zacarias Moussaoui, the once-alleged 20th hijacker, and in order not to compromise the case, it mustn't be disclosed. They signed nondisclosure agreements and were not permitted to take notes. Civil attorneys and the media were barred. F.B.I. agents filled the halls of the hotel and took any camera or recording equipment before people were admitted to the ballroom. Those who left the three-and-a-half-hour session to relieve themselves were accompanied into rest rooms by agents.
The families heard a tape that has just now surfaced. Recorded by American Airlines at its headquarters in Fort Worth, Tex., even as the first hijacked airliner, Flight 11, was being taken over, the tape shows the airline's top management was made aware beginning at about 8:21 a.m.-25 minutes before the impact of the first plane into the World Trade Center's north tower-that a group of men described as Middle Eastern had stabbed two flight attendants, clouded the forward cabin with pepper spray or Mace, menaced crew and passengers with what looked like a bomb, and stormed the cockpit in a violent takeover....
[NOTE: Research suggests that hijackers most likely gained access to cockpits by using the common key called "Boeing key" kept by flight attendents. On several of the flights hijackers attacked flight attendents first.
Despite all the high secrecy surrounding the briefing, a half-dozen different family members were so horrified by voice evidence of the airlines' disregard for the fate of their pilots, crew and passengers that they found ways to reveal some of what they heard on those tapes, and also what they felt.
To them, the tapes appeared to show that the first instinct of American and United Airlines, as management learned of the gathering horror aboard their passenger planes on Sept. 11, was to cover up. The response of American's management on duty, as revealed on the tape produced at the meeting, was recalled by persons in attendance: "Don't spread this around. Keep it close." "Keep it quiet." "Let's keep this among ourselves. What else can we find out from our own sources about what's going on?"
"It was disgusting" ...."Flight 77 (the third flight hijacked as part of the September 11 attacks) should never have taken off"
|ABOUT: Silverstein Properties |
On April 26 of 2001 the Board of Commissioners for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey awarded Silverstein Properties and mall-owner Westfield America a 99-year-lease on the following assets: The Twin Towers, World Trade Center Buildings 4 and 5, two 9-story office buildings, and 400,000 square feet of retail space. The partners' winning bid was $3.2 billion for holdings estimated to be worth more than $8 billion.The lead partner and spokesperson for the winning bidders, Larry Silverstein, age 70, already controlled more than 8 million square feet of New York City real estate, including WTC 7. The lease deal didn't close until July 24th, just 6 weeks before the attack.
The new controllers acquired a handsome insurance policy for the complex including a clause that would prove extremely valuable: in the event of a terrorist attack, the partnership could collect the insured value of the property, and be released from their obligations under the 99-year lease.
In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties' estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. So: Building 7's collapse resulted in a profit of about $500 million.
After the attack, Silverstein Properties commenced litigation against its insurers, claiming it was entitled to twice the insurance policies' value because, according to a spokesman for Mr. Silverstein, "the two hijacked airliners that struck the 110-story twin towers Sept. 11 were separate 'occurrences' for insurance purposes, entitling him to collect twice on $3.6 billion of policies."
In December 2003, the Port Authority agreed to return all of the $125 million in equity that the consortium headed by Silverstein originally invested to buy the lease on the World Trade Center. The Port Authority rejected a request by the Wall Street Journal to review the transaction. A press report from November 2003 about the same transaction noted that it would allow Silverstein to retain development rights.
In December 2004, a jury ruled in favor of Silverstein's double claim, entitling him to collect twice on $3.6 billion of policies. By 2007, when the final tally is in, Silverstein will have collected a total of 4.55 billion dollars in insurance proceeds.
To put these events in perspective, imagine that a person leases an expensive house, and immediately takes out an insurance policy covering the entire value of the house and specifically covering bomb attacks. Six weeks later two bombs go off in the house, separated by an hour. The house burns down, and the lessor immediately sues the insurance company to pay him twice the value of the house, and ultimately wins. The lessor also gets the city to dispose of the wreckage, excavate the site, and help him build a new house on the site.
In March of 2008 it is revealed that Larry Silverstein, the developer of Ground Zero, is seeking $12.3 billion in damages from airlines and airport security companies for the attacks on 9/11. Silverstein sought the damages in a claim filed in 2004, alleging that the companies failed to prevent the hijackers from taking over the planes that destroyed the World Trade Center buildings. The size of his claim was previously unknown, but is now revealed at a status conference in the US District Court in Manhattan.
WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein was supposed to have been working on September 11, 2001 in the temporary offices of his company, Silverstein Properties, on the 88th floor of the North Tower. However, at his Park Avenue apartment, Silverstein’s wife reportedly “laid down the law: The developer could not cancel an appointment with his dermatologist, even to meet with tenants at his most important property.” [New York Observer, 3/17/2003; New York Magazine, 4/18/2005] He is therefore not at the WTC when it is hit, and first hears of the attacks when an associate calls him from the lobby of one of the WTC buildings. [Real Deal, 1/2004]
Two of Silverstein’s children—his son, Roger, and daughter, Lisa, each of whom have spouses and three children, work for his company and have been regularly attending meetings with WTC tenants at Windows on the World (the restaurant at the top of the North Tower). Yet on September 11th, both happened to have been running late. According to the New York Observer, “If the attack had happened just a little later, Mr. Silverstein’s children would likely have been trapped at Windows.” [New York Observer, 3/17/2003] Fifty-four of Silverstein Properties’ 160 person staff were in the North Tower when it is hit, and four of them died.
|CNN BREAKING NEWS|
Terrorist Attack on United States
Aired September 11, 2001 - 08:48 ET
CAROL LIN, CNN ANCHOR:
LIN: For our viewers who are just tuning in right now, you are looking at live picture of the World Trade Center tower, where, according to eyewitness Sean Murtagh -- he is the vice president of finance and eyewitness to what he describes as a twin-engine plane -- or possibly a 737 passenger jet -- flying into the World Trade Center. It appears to be still embedded inside the building. Sean, are you in a position to hear whether any sirens are going, any ambulances, any response to this yet?
MURTAGH: Not from my vantage point. I am probably 1 1/2 to two miles from the World Trade Center.
LIN: Sean , thank you so much for your eyewitness account there. Right now, we want to go to our affiliate NYW, reporting on this as we speak.
JIM RYAN (ph), WNYW REPORTER: Did you see what happened, sir? Did you see what happened? What happened?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I was in the PATH train, and there was a huge explosion sound; everyone came out. A large section of the building had blown out around the 80th floor.
RYAN: Was it hit by something, or was it something inside.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: It was inside.
RYAN: It was inside. ----------------
CELLINI: Again, you are looking at pictures now. We understand from a CNN vice president, Sean Murtagh, who was an eyewitness to this, that a commercial jet has crashed into one of the towers of the World Trade Center. You can see the smoke billowing out. There are flames billowing out there, a commercial jet crashing into one of these towers. At this point, we do not have official injury updates to bring you. We are only now beginning to put together the pieces of this horrible incident.
LIN: Just a few second ago, we were tuning into one of our affiliates in New York, WNYW. We want to go to an eyewitness on the telephone right now. Jeanne, what can you tell us what you saw?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I can tell you that I was watching TV, and there was this sonic boom, and the TV went out. And I thought maybe the Concorde was back in service, because I've heard about that sonic boom. And I went to the window -- I live in Battery Park City, right next to the twin towers -- and I looked up, and the side of the World Trade Center exploded. At that point, debris started falling. I couldn't believe what I was watching.
LIN: Jeanne, we are continuing to look at pictures of this devastating scene, according to Sean Murtagh, vice president of finance, who witnessed what he described as a twin-engine plane, possibly a 737. he was almost absolutely sure it was a large passenger jet that went into that. Jeanne, you are saying you didn't see anything initially. You didn't see a plane approach the building?
YURMAN: I had no idea it was a plane. I just saw the entire top part of the World Trade Center explode. So I turned on the TV when I heard they said it was a plane. It was really strange.
LIN: Were you living in New York during the World Trade Center bombing?
YURMAN: No, I wasn't.
LIN: Fortunately so. When you say a sonic boom, did you feel anything? Were things shaking in your apartment?
YURMAN: Yes, you could feel it. It was a gigantic sonic boom. The TV went off for a second and went back on. And the windows -- you felt the vibrations on the windows. ----- LIN: ... eyewitness here to a loud sonic boom, she described, as she was sitting inside her apartment, and she looked up and saw the side of the World Trade Center exploded into flames and black smoke.
Scientists Interviewed on Danish Television
Discovery of Nano-Thermite Explosives in WTC rubble:
7 part interview This is Part 2, skipping superfluous intro.
Alternatively: Text and still photo section re 9/11 Directed Energy Weaponry link:
Judy D. Wood, Ph.D.
Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials. She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and currently serves on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division.
* B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering),
* M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983)
* Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics
at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
|UNITED AIRLINES FLIGHT 93 : HEROISM & TRAGEDY|
Botched False Flag Operation
Remote control enabled plane, Authorized Military Shoot Down AFTER Passengers Re-Took Plane
OFFICIAL STORY United Airlines Flight 93, a Boeing 757-200, was a scheduled United States domestic passenger flight from Newark International Airport, in Newark, New Jersey, to San Francisco International Airport, in San Francisco, California that was hijacked by four terrorists as part of the September 11 attacks in 2001. It had originally been scheduled to depart at 8:01AM but was delayed on the runway until 8:42AM. At 9:29AM less than 45 minutes into the flight, the hijackers had breached the cockpit, overpowered the pilots, and had taken control of the aircraft, diverting it towards Washington, D.C.
Several passengers and crew members made telephone calls aboard the flight and learned about the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. As a result, the passengers decided to mount an assault against the hijackers and regain control of the aircraft.
The 9/11 Commission concluded that the hijackers downed the plane as the hostages revolted.
United Airlines Flight 93 crashed into a reclaimed strip mine in Somerset County, Pennsylvania. The site is between Shanksville and Bucktown, near Diamond T Coal Co., in Friedens.
First responders found little more than a smoking, airplane shaped hole in the soft ground along with scattered small jet fuel fires which were quickly extinguished. Surrounding trees and brush were blackened from the explosion.
The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) issued a statement denying that United Flight 93 had been shot down by U.S. military aircraft.
Below: the "official story" timeline and flight path
Official story is that one wing tip struck first, cockpit and front third of fuselage broke off and exploded in airborne fireball, without appreciably impacting ground, while back two thirds of fuselage simultaneouslycompletely buried itself in the soft ground, leaving a perfect body, tail and wings imprint. Black box located in aft end of plane was found 15' down. Bulk of craft left little wreckage above ground, much like ValuJet Flight 592. Bits of human remains and small pieces of plane debris from UA93 were blown airborne in the explosion and dissipated in an arc pattern over roughly a seventy acre area, landing both on the ground and high in trees. Trees with visible debris were marked and climbed for retrieval. When the weather changed. leaves dropped, wind increased and remaining debris in trees, previously inaccessible, eventually fell, were recovered, and turned over to local coroner.
|"....Authorities weren't ready yesterday to pronounce the crash a result of terrorism. But a telling detail came minutes before the plane went down when dispatchers at the Westmoreland County Emergency Operations Center intercepted a frantic cell phone call made to 911 by a passenger aboard the doomed flight.|
"We are being hijacked, we are being hijacked!" the man told dispatchers in a quivering voice during a conversation that lasted about one minute. "We got the call about 9:58 this morning from a male passenger stating that he was locked in the bathroom of United Flight 93 traveling from Newark to San Francisco, and they were being hijacked," said Glenn Cramer, a 911 supervisor. "We confirmed that with him several times and we asked him to repeat what he said. He was very distraught. He said he believed the plane was going down.
He did hear some sort of an explosion and saw white smoke coming from the plane, but he didn't know where. "And then we lost contact with him" ....Agents seized the 911 dispatch tape from Westmoreland County as part of their investigation. " Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Sept. 12, 2001
Susan McElwain, 51, who lives two miles from the crash site, knows what she saw - a small white plane of some sort rocketed directly over her head as she drove. It was white with no markings but it was definitely military, she said. It just had that look. "It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back of a car and with two upright fins at the side. I haven't found one like it on the internet. It definitely wasn't one of those executive jets. The FBI came and talked to me and said there was no plane around. Then they changed their story and tried to say it was a plane taking pictures of the crash 3,000 ft up. But I saw it and it was there before the crash... They did not want my story - nobody here did."
Some have suggested that the plane was a Dassault Falcon 20 business jet, but that plane does not match the detailed description provided by Susan McElwain. It lacks the two upright fins on the sides of the spoiler. The A-10 Thunderbolt has the fins but it's too large and the fuselage doesn't match the description. McElwain positively ruled out both of them. She said what she saw was significantly smaller and didn't have traditional style wings.
Her on-site description of a white airborne entity which suddenly descended, directly in front of her moving van, is at right. She mentions also that although it was large enough to fill the windshield of her van it was still somewhat compact, no wider than her van, it had a seamless fuselage, with no visible rivets, almost like molded fiberglas. It was so shiny it looked brand new. It was also [soundless]. It bobbed and weaved, gliding smoothly up over a stand of trees and disappeared from sight. Suddenly a huge plume of smoke appeared from beyond the trees. McElwain thought it was the white plane which had crashed and rushed to the nearest home to find help.
Mrs. McElwain, who looks after special needs children, is further convinced the whole truth has yet to come out because of a phone call she had within hours from the wife of an Air Force friend of the family. "She said her husband had called her that morning and said 'I can't talk, but we've just shot a plane down,'
Lee Purbaugh, 32, was the only person to see the last seconds of Flight 93 as it came down on former strip-mining land at precisely 10.06am - and he also saw a white jet.
ABOVE: A brief excerpt from the interview with Susan McElwain. The full interview along with additional details may be viewed on THIS page, which also provides information about Directed Energy Weapons and the Doomsday Plane.
At 9:58AM an emergency call is received at the 911 center in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania, from Edward Felt, a passenger on Flight 93. Felt makes the 911 call using his cell phone. It is answered by dispatcher John Shaw, on a line at the center specifically for incoming cell phone calls. Glenn Cramer, a Supervisor at the 911 center, hears Shaw responding to the caller, “You are what, hijacked?” and he picks up a listen-only monitoring phone which allows him to listen in on Felt’s call. Felt, speaking in a low pitched voice over the roar of the airplane, identifies himself and despite the fact that Felt spells his name, Shaw and Cramer apparently mishear, and both will recall that he says his name is “Ed Wart.” Felt says, “We are being hijacked, we are being hijacked!” He repeatedly states that his call is not a hoax. He says the passengers need help immediately. Shaw asks Felt standard questions, such as where is he? What type of plane is he on? And what has happened? Felt tells Shaw his cell phone number and says he is on United Airlines Flight 93 from Newark to San Francisco. He says he is locked in the bathroom of the plane, but does not say if this is its front or rear bathroom. Felt says: “We’re going down. We’re going down.”
Cramer who was closely monitoring the conversation, will report to the FBI investigator that Felt described hearing an explosion on the aircraft (witnesses on the ground corroborate this) and seeing smoke [before having entered the more soundproof lav to make the call], but he says he doesn't know where it's coming from. Shaw will later deny this. He will also state that the call lasted less than five minutes before the line goes dead. After the call ends, other employees at the Westmoreland County 911 center are instructed to notify the FBI and the FAA . When the FBI arrives at the center, it will immediately take possession of the tape of Felt’s call.
Glenn Cramer, the emergency supervisor who monitored the call, said on the day: "He was very distraught. He said he believed the plane was going down. He did hear some sort of an explosion and saw white smoke coming from the plane, but he didn't know where. And then we lost contact with him." Cramer's interview is at right. Several newspapers carried corresponding reports. Glenn Cramer has now been gagged by the FBI.
The FBI report of the Sept.12, 2001 interview with Supervisor Glenn Cramer (dictated Sept. 19, 2001) which referenced the explosion and white smoke remark made by Ed Felt (report displayed at right, click to enlarge) has now been switched, replaced with the official story, Shaw's interview, in which Felt's comment regarding an explosion and smoke has disappeared.
The second version also carries a date of April 27, 2004. The official version of the call from Felt states that it lasted just over one minute. In March of 2002 a portion of the tape which did not contain comments about the explosion and white smoke was played for Felt's wife, who identified it as his voice. The official transcript is also missing the explosion and smoke comments as well as other comments made by Felt which were earlier reported to the FBI by both Shaw and Cramer.
PASSENGER Edward Porter Felt, a calm, clear thinking problem solver, was a technical director for BEA Systems, a billion-dollar software firm in Liberty Corner, New Jersey. Felt was one BEA's top five engineers. A graduate of Colgate, Felt earned his masters degree from Cornell University.
At 9.58am, minutes before the United Flight 93 crashed, a 911 call - the last mobile phone contact from Flight 93 - was made from inside one of the airliner's lavatories by passenger Edward Felt.
|HIJACKED AT:||TIME CRASHED:||COMMENTS:|
|WTC 1||American # 11||7:45 AM Attack # 1||7:59 AM FIRST||14 minutes||8:20AM +/-||8:45 AM Attack # 1|
|WTC 2||United #175||7:58 AM Attack # 2||8:14 AM SECOND||16 minutes||8:42AM +/-||9:03 AM Attack # 2||Target hit 18 minutes after first attack|
|PENTAGON||American # 77||8:10 AM Attack # 4||8:20 AM THIRD||10 minutes||9:12AM +/-||9:37 AM Attack # 3||Target hit 34 minutes after second attack|
|WTC 7||United # 93||8:01 AM Attack # 3||8:42 AM FOURTH||41 minutes||9:29AM +/-||10:06 AM|
Mission was aborted at 10:03AM and flight was diverted, taking a nearly 45 degree turn clockwise.
TRANSPONDER was turned back on at 10:05AM when UA93 was at altitude 8200', approx. thirteen miles southeast of the eventual crash site.
Flight was too far out to reach WTC 7 in a timely manner without raising further suspicions. United 93 was remotely rerouted over a sparsely populated area.
The plane was fired upon.
At a speed of 580 mph, from a height of 8200 ft, 13 miles out, this aircraft could have hit the ground in less than ten seconds. Like KAL 007, however, UA93 also managed to stay aloft for a short period of time (approx. one minute) after it was struck.
Radar contact was lost at 10:06AM.
"I am an Air Force veteran. I was serving at Langley AFB, Virginia on Sept. 11. (not to be confused with CIA headquarters at Langley, VA). The "Alert Squadron" of 4 F-16 Falcons also stationed at Langley AFB was scrambled AFTER the "plane" crashed into the Pentagon. Because of my position as a ground equipment mechanic, I had access to the flightline operations that day. My friends were Crew Cheifs and Weapons Loaders, among other professions on the flightline that day. One of my [unusual] duties that day was to drive a Loader (personal friend) along with a rack of live missiles (AIM-9's and AIM-120's) across the active runway to the Alert Squadron and drop them off. I was towing equipment to the flightline, so when it was time to go back and pick up the Loader (and our missile trailer) I was unable to do so, but another member of my Flight (a good friend, and later roommate) did go. According to my roommate (and I later confirmed with the Loader) the Loader was completely silent most of the trip back to our side of the base, after they crossed the active, he spoke. "They shot one down." JJ replied "WHAT?" Loader:"One of those 16's came back with one less missile than it left with" That was all. As they pulled back in to the squadron area, The loader was whisked away by his commanders for debriefing. I didn't see him for a few days, but when I did, he said he couldn't talk about it, but he confirmed that what my roommate had told me was true.The US Air Force shot down Flight 93. I haven't told this to many people. I told my parents and other family members shortly after I left the military. They didn't believe it. I figured no one else would either. I kept my mouth shut. Everyone was dedicated to the president and the country (not really) And anything that went against the Official, media delivered story was viewed as unpatriotic. I knew that I loved this country, so I kept my mouth shut. I just can't do that anymore. I know that I don't have any documents to prove it, and I have no way of knowing where the others involved are now days, so I can't prove anything. All I have is my word. and with God as my witness that is the truth."
At the time I was A1C, I worked at 1st EMS, AGE flight. It is possible these planes were launched before the pentagon was hit, although my recollection is that they launched after. I wasn't watching TV at the time, I was rushing equipment around the flightline, as we were also trying to get some broken F-15's off the ground before our deadline to have EVERY flight capable F-15 airborne. I am anonymous, because I had a SECRET clearance at the time, and I could face legal action if this just happened to be classified information, though I have no knowledge that it is. In regards to total number of aircraft at the "alert" squadron I don't know. Four aircraft could normally be seen at the alert hangar. The squadron was a detachment of the 119th FW of the North Dakota Air National Guard. This detachment was stationed at langley in 2001 and flew F-16's. I do not know the pilot or his name, and as I said, a weapons loader conveyed the story to me, I am just passing it along. The story may or may not be what happened, but I am telling the truth about what I experienced, and what conversations I had. .... I just don't want someone who would try to do harm to me to know anything about me if they find out I am saying something I am not supposed to be saying. There weren't that many people in my flight, maybe 100, probably less. I worked in Blue CAT (Combat AGE Team). And normally supported the 94th Fighter Squadron, in which there were 27-29 F-15C/D aircraft. I left the military before the F-22's came on line. All I have is my word.....- Jeremy
|Whistleblower: That morning my wife and I were watching a TV broadcast that was 'live' with an emergency operator talking with someone on flight 93. The person onboard said something like "They're shooting at us; they've hit the wing", and the connection ended. To my knowledge, that was never rebroadcast. We've never heard anything about that conversation since, or talked to anyone who saw the broadcast. A few days later, my brother-in-law, an air-traffic controller, told us the USAF shot 93 down for certain. Many ATC's were monitoring USAF radio traffic. - Cypherstone|
|Ernie Stuhl, the mayor of Shanksville: “I know of two people—I will not mention names— that heard a missile. They both live very close, within a couple of hundred yards ... This one fellow's served in Vietnam and he says he's heard them, and he heard one that day.” He adds that based on what he has learned, F-16s were “very, very close.”|
|(Just Before 10:06 a.m.) September 11, 2001: Lights Go Out Before Flight 93 Crashes, Allegedly Indicating a Missile Being Fired |
John Fleegle, a manager at the Indian Lake Marina about 1.5 miles from where Flight 93 crashes, is indoors with some colleagues, watching the televised coverage of the World Trade Center attack. Then, as he later describes, “All of a sudden the lights flickered and we joked that maybe they were coming for us. Then we heard engines screaming close overhead. The building shook. We ran out, heard the explosion and saw a fireball mushroom,” following the crash. When he later describes this incident while on a training course in Atlanta, Fleegle will be told that what happened means Flight 93 “was shot down.” A man there who says he is a retired Air Force officer will tell Fleegle, “When your lights flickered, [it was because] they zap the radar frequency on everything before they shoot. Your lights didn’t flicker from the impact—your lights flickered because they zapped the radar system before they shot it.” However, William “Buck” Kernan, a retired four-star Army general, will dispute this claim, saying, “Regarding an aircraft engaging an airborne target having an electrical disruption on the ground, no, this would not be a result of lock on or any electromagnetic pulsing.” He will suggest it is “possible that overpressure from explosions could momentarily disrupt microwave connections or cause sensations on ground relays, wiring, etc.” that might result in the lights having flickered. [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, 9/14/2001; Lappe and Marshall, 2004, pp. 35-36] But, consistent with Fleegle’s allegation, a number of local residents—including military veterans—say they heard the sound of a missile overhead just before the time of the crash (see Just Before 10:06 a.m. September 11, 2001). Another local resident, Val McClatchey, will report her lights and phone going out around the time of the crash. [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, 9/11/2002] According to Barry Lichty, the mayor of Indian Lake Borough, the town’s electricity goes out around this time. He later learns that the plane crash had disrupted service to the borough. [Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, 9/12/2001] Interestingly, one alternative theory later suggested is that Flight 93 could have been brought down using “electromagnetic interference” (see August 13, 2002). The US Air Force and Pentagon have in fact “conducted extensive research on ‘electronic warfare applications’ with the possible capacity intentionally to disrupt the mechanisms of an airplane in such a way as to provoke, for example, an uncontrollable dive.” [Independent, 8/13/2002]
|WHO BENEFITS from the crash of Flight 93?|
Military Industrial Complex
Big Oil Bankers funding war declared as a direct result of attacks Influential members of political party in power at time of attacks. Project For New American Century (NeoCon world domination agenda)
Loss of US Civil Liberties
Had this flight made it to its' original target, WTC 7, in a timely manner, the Silverstein Group might not have been suspected of complicity.
In the "official story", the target for this flight was either the White House or the Capitol Building in Washington, D.C. the destruction of which would have represented a direct assault on America's pride and national identity.
One very important False Flag objective for the events of 9/11 was for the nation, in an automatic response, and without pausing to question the events, to simply accept the official story and band together as Americans, accepting any official conclusion, and any retaliatory decision made by the Administration.During WWII, the government worked with Hollywood directly in order to use films as a powerful propaganda tool to promote the war. Movies were the perfect avenue through which the government could inspire support from the public. Of the many kinds of films that Hollywood produced during World War II to rally the public behind the war effort, perhaps the most distinctive was the combat film which gave viewers on the home front a vicarious sense of participating. Typically, these films focused on a small group of men involved in a life-or-death mission: struggling valiantly to hold an island or to attack a target deep behind enemy lines. Although these groups were usually commanded by a strong leader, success ultimately depended on the men's ability to operate as a team, balancing individual acts of heroism with professionalism and mutual cooperation. Although these groups were usually commanded by a strong leader, success ultimately depended on the men's ability to operate as a team, balancing individual acts of heroism with professionalism and mutual cooperation. Even after the war was over, films continued to show the official story of the war, glorifying the efforts of the soldiers to show that their sacrifice was worth it.
The movie Flight 93, released midway during the Bush Administration's second term, and just before mid-term elections, was an exceptionally well made film which achieved a similar objective.
"Governments, in order to perpetuate themselves, will sacrifice 400-500 people without a second thought".14-year DEA veteran Basil Abbott
Both President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney personally intervened and asked Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (Dem. - S.D.) "to limit the congressional investigation into the events of Sept. 11," according to CNN.Bush made the unusual request at a private meeting with congressional leaders on January 29, 2002. He asked that the House and Senate intelligence committees only look into "the potential breakdowns among federal agencies that could have allowed the terrorist attacks to occur," rather than conduct a comprehensive inquiry.
Cheney made a similar appeal to Daschle on Jan. 25. "The vice president expressed the concern that a review of what happened on September 11 would take resources and personnel away from the effort in the war on terrorism," Daschle said. "I acknowledged that concern, and it is for that reason that the Intelligence Committee is going to begin this effort, trying to limit the scope and the overall review of what happened," Daschle said.
Although the president and vice president told Daschle they were worried a wide-reaching inquiry could distract from the government's war on terrorism, privately Democrats questioned why the White House feared a broader investigation to determine possible culpability.
|ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth.org) founded by .Richard Gage, AIA, San Francisco Bay Area architect and a member of the American Institute of Architects. The organization has amassed the signatures of nearly one thousand architectural and engineering professionals in addition to over 5800 other supporters including Architecture & Engineering students, on a petition demanding of Congress a truly independent investigation.|
|PILOTS for 9/11 Truth is an organization of aviation professionals and pilots throughout the globe who have gathered together for one purpose. We are committed to seeking the truth surrounding the events of the 11th of September 2001. Our main focus concentrates on the four flights, maneuvers performed and the reported pilots. We do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, we are focused on determining the truth of that fateful day based on solid data and facts -- since 9/11/2001 is the catalyst for many of the events shaping our world today -- and the United States Government doesn't seem to be very forthcoming with answers or facts. We stand with the numerous other growing organizations of Firefighters, Medical Professionals, Lawyers, Scholars, Scientists, Architects and Engineers, Veterans, Religious and Political Leaders, along side family members of the victims -- family members of soldiers who have made the ultimate sacrifice -- including the many Ground Zero workers who are now ill or have passed away, when we ask for a true, new independent investigation into the events of 9/11.We do not accept the 9/11 Commission Report and/or "hypothesis" as a satisfactory explanation for the sacrifice every American has made and continues to make -- some more than others. Thank you for taking the time to inform yourself. - pilotsfor911truth.org|
|As early as January of 2002, Fire Engineering magazine, the 125-year-old respected journal of firefighting, which publishes technical studies of major fires, criticized the WTC investigation being run by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as "a half-baked farce."|
Fire Engineering said it "has good reason to believe that the 'official investigation', blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers, is a half-baked farce, commandeered by political forces whose primary interests lie far afield of full disclosure."
Fire Engineering's editor, WiIliam A. Manning wrote in the January issue, "respected members of the fire protection engineering community are beginning to raise red flags, and a resonating theory has emerged: The structural damage from the planes and the explosive ignition of jet fuel in themselves were not enough to bring down the towers."
FIREFIGHTERS for 9/11 Truth: Firefighters for 9-11 Truth is a non-partisan association of firefighters and affiliates created to increase awareness, provide public education, demand a real investigation that follows National Standards, and provide support to our Brothers and Sisters in need. We are deeply troubled by the “official story,” and the way the rescue workers from Ground Zero are being forgotten. We believe there is overwhelming evidence of obstruction of justice, and destruction of evidence voiced even by numerous 9/11 Commissioners themselves. Senator Cleland resigned from the Commission stating, “This investigation is now compromised.” NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) 921, which is the National Standard for Fire and Explosion Investigations, very clearly indicates in numerous sections that the possibility of explosives should have been thoroughly investigated. Specifically in NFPA 921 18.3.2 High Order Damage - “High-order damage is characterized by shattering of the structure, producing small, pulverized debris. Walls, roofs, and structural members are splintered or shattered, with the building completely demolished. Debris is thrown great distances, possibly hundreds of feet. High-order damage is the result of rapid rates of pressure rise.” World Trade Center’s 1, 2, and 7 all clearly met this definition; therefore they should have been thoroughly investigated and analyzed for explosives. Specifically, the use of “exotic accelerants” should have been investigated. In NFPA 921 19.2.4 -”Exotic Accelerants,” three indicators were clearly met that should have led to a thorough investigation in to the possible use of “exotic accelerants,” specifically as stated in the guideline, “Thermite mixtures.” So, why was the possibility of explosives, controlled demolition, or the use of “exotic accelerants” not thoroughly investigated, or even mentioned in the 9-11 Commission Report?
Firefighters for 9-11 Truth demand the following:
1. A truly independent investigation with Subpoena and Contempt Powers to uncover the complete truth of the events related to 9/11/2001, specifically the collapse of WTC Tower 7 and the possibility of explosive demolition.
2. The investigation to follow the national standards so clearly outlined in the National Fire Protection Association guidelines, specifically, NFPA 921 to include thorough analysis of the steel for the presence of “exotic accelerants.”
3. Congress to honor the promises made to the rescue workers of 9/11 by passing the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2008.
4. Prosecution of all individuals willfully involved in the planning, and execution of the murders committed on September 11, 2001.
5. Prosecution of all individuals willfully involved in the Obstruction of Justice and Destruction of Evidence surrounding the events of September 11, 2001.
We challenge you to look at the evidence with an open mind and make judgments. Remember, you don’t have to be an expert to sit on a jury, and you have the right to be critical of, and demand answers from the “experts.” Take the time to gather facts, and have the courage to ask for more. If you come to the same conclusion as the FBI, and don’t place him on your “most wanted” list, then have the courage to help find those responsible for the death of so many of our Brothers and Sisters. We all need to show some courage by demanding answers, justice, and fair treatment for the Ground Zero Rescue Workers!!--FirefightersFor911Truth.org
|MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS for 9/11 Truth: As medical professionals, we are dedicated to the service of humanity; to alleviating suffering, to improving health, and to preserving life. We are horrified by the terrorist acts of 9/11 and the senseless suffering and loss of life resulting from them. The terrorist acts of 9/11 resulted in the immediate deaths of 3,000 emergency service workers and innocent citizens. The inhalation of toxic dust in the weeks following 9/11 will result in the premature deaths of additional thousands of rescue and construction workers and New York residents. The acts of 9/11 have been further used to justify the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, which have resulted in the deaths of thousands of military personnel and hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians. As medical professionals, we are trained in science and logical reasoning. We are appalled by the lack of scientific rigor and the substantial omissions and blatant distortions in the official account of 9/11 as embodied in the 9/11 Commission Report and related government documents. We are not alone in our concerns about the validity of the 9/11 Commission Report. A group of 25 senior U.S. intelligence services and law enforcement veterans sent a joint letter to the U.S. Congress expressing similar concerns and their desire for a new investigation. Several very senior CIA veterans have called the 9/11 Commission Report "a cover up" and "a joke" and have called for a new investigation. Several former Republican administration senior appointees have called for a new investigation. Several U.S. State Department veterans have called for a new investigation. And dozens of former senior U.S. military officers have also called for a new investigation. It is imperative that we have an accurate understanding of 9/11 so that those responsible can be identified and brought to justice in order that they and similarly-minded people never again commit such heinous crimes. It is also imperative that we have an accurate understanding of 9/11 so that governmental policies resulting from 9/11 are based on truth rather than deception. We join with other organizations of professionals, such as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, and Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, and millions of individual citizens in demanding a thorough, impartial, open and transparent reinvestigation of the terrorist acts of 9/11.|
PETITION: We, the members of Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth, believe that whereas:
* There is incontrovertible publicly available evidence since 9/11/01 that the official account of the events of that day is incomplete and fraught with errors;
* The 9/11 Commission Report inadequately answered, and in numerous cases even failed to address, many of the most important questions that were called to its attention;
* The blatant disregard of extensive compelling evidence that clearly refutes the official account raises rational suspicion of intentional deception by agents of the U.S. Government;
* U.S. Government policies have been, and continue to be, founded upon assumptions about the events of 9/11 that are likely to be erroneous;
* Life-threatening maladies caused by toxic environmental conditions at Ground Zero in New York City persist today and will continue to develop in the future; and
* The perpetrators of the heinous crimes against humanity that were committed on 9/11 have still not been brought to justice.
Therefore, we, the members of Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth, call for a new and independent investigation into the events of 9/11/01 by a duly constituted legal body with the authority to subpoena and require testimony under oath, and with authority to prosecute if criminal activity is discovered, so that the perpetrators of these crimes against humanity can at last be brought to justice.--mp911truth.org
|LAWYERS For 9/11 Truth: Lawyers are trained to value the Constitution and the rule of law. We are trained to examine evidence and to spot cover-ups or inconsistencies in the evidence and bias in witnesses or decision-makers. Attorneys are also experts in weighing conflicting evidence. For all of the above reasons, many lawyers have concluded that the 9/11 Commission and other government examinations were wholly inadequate, and did not follow proper rules of evidence or procedure. We are demanding an end to the 9/11 cover-up, and a full investigation by unbiased people with subpoena power . . . and the courage to demand that the Constitution and rule of law are followed, and all guilty persons held accountable for their actions.|
Former Instructor of Criminal Trial Practice, Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California at Berkeley 11-year teaching career. Retired Chief Assistant Public Defender, Contra Costa County, California 31-year career (William Veale) said:
"When you grow up in the United States, there are some bedrock principles that require concerted effort to discard. One is the simplest: that our leaders are good and decent people whose efforts may occasionally warrant criticism but never because of malice or venality... But one grows up. ... And with the lawyer's training comes the reliance on evidence and the facts that persuade... After a lot of reading, thought, study, and commiseration, I have come to the conclusion that the attacks of 9/11 were, in their essence, an inside job perpetrated at the highest levels of the U S government."--
L911T.com , 911summary.com
|"For most people, the norm is “to go along to get along.” When you start raising questions about 9/11, people in your family might tell you not to do that. They themselves might feel in danger, because the implications of 9/11 are quite clear.|
There is an instantaneous recognition that if you link the events of 9/11 to high tech weaponry, there are only two sources of these weapons;
1) the U.S. military which has a strict chain of command and;
2) the military-industrial complex, that is, the corporations that manufacture weapons, which may not be under the control of the U.S. military chain of command."-- J.Leaphart, JD
Jerry Leaphart, J.D., is a trial lawyer, and a bar member in New York, New Jersey and Conneticut with over 33 years of national and international law experience.
|MILITARY & INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY|
Director of the U.S. "Star Wars" space defense program in both Republican and Democratic administrations, a senior air force colonel who flew 101 combat missions (Col. Robert Bowman) stated that 9/11 was an inside job. He also said: "If our government had merely [done] nothing, and I say that as an old interceptor pilot—I know the drill, I know what it takes, I know how long it takes, I know what the procedures are, I know what they were, and I know what they’ve changed them to—if our government had merely done nothing, and allowed normal procedures to happen on that morning of 9/11, the Twin Towers would still be standing and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive. That is treason!"
U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director, decorated with the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal (Capt. Daniel Davis) stated: "there is no way that an aircraft . . . would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control ... Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a 'conspiracy Theory' does not change the truth. It seems, 'Something is rotten in the State.' "
Lieutenant colonel, 24-year Air Force career, Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs at the Defense Language Institute (Lt. Colonel Steve Butler) said "Of course Bush knew about the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism."
U.S. Air Force fighter pilot, former instructor at the USAF Fighter Weapons School and NATO’s Tactical Leadership Program, with a 20-year Air Force career (Lt. Colonel Guy S. Razer) said the following: "I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government .... Those of us in the military took an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic". Just because we have retired does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it. We owe it to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and who are doing the same thing in Iraq and Afghanistan right now. Those of us who joined the military and faithfully executed orders that were given us had to trust our leaders. The violation and abuse of that trust is not only heinous, but ultimately the most accurate definition of treason!"
U.S. Marine Corps lieutenant colonel, a fighter pilot with over 300 combat missions flown and a 21-year Marine Corps career (Lt. Colonel Shelton F. Lankford) believes that 9/11 was an inside job, and said: "This isn't about party, it isn't about Bush Bashing. It's about our country, our constitution, and our future. ... Your countrymen have been murdered and the more you delve into it the more it looks as though they were murdered by our government, who used it as an excuse to murder other people thousands of miles away. If you ridicule others who have sincere doubts and who know factual information that directly contradicts the official report and who want explanations from those who hold the keys to our government, and have motive, means, and opportunity to pull off a 9/11, but you are too lazy or fearful, or ... to check into the facts yourself, what does that make you? .... Are you afraid that you will learn the truth and you can't handle it? ..."
A 27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and personally delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many other senior government officials (Raymond McGovern) said “I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke”, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job.
A 29-year CIA veteran, former National Intelligence Officer (NIO) and former Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis (William Bill Christison) said “I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe. ... All three [buildings that were destroyed in the World Trade Center] were most probably destroyed by controlled demolition charges placed in the buildings before 9/11."
A decorated 20-year CIA veteran, who Pulitzer-Prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh called "perhaps the best on-the-ground field officer in the Middle East”, and whose astounding career formed the script for the Academy Award winning motion picture Syriana (Robert Baer) said that "the evidence points at" 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside job .
The "official" explanations of the World Trade Center building collapses that have been given by the 9/11 Commission Report and NIST are not physically possible.
A new, politically impartial, scientific investigation is needed to set history straight and bring the real perpetrators, the ones who have infiltrated our own government, and murdered their fellow Americans, to justice.
DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONRY - PROVEN TECHNOLOGY
In 1991, before the Soviet military withdrew from East Germany, the GRU demonstrated for the U.S. Air Force Electronic Security Command (AFESC) the capabilities of its infrared beam weapon by reducing a ceramic plate into dust from a distance of one mile.
A former East German physicist who studied Soviet infrared technology and plasmoids during the 60s and 70s, and who was directly involved in a demonstration of a Soviet laser beam weapon in 1991 for the U.S. Air Force in Weimar (DDR), has stated that there is evidence that a directed-energy weapon using "deep infrared" radiation was used to bring down the WTC.
Although infrared weapon technology is not widely discussed in the West, the Soviet infrared beam weapon is nothing new and was already used during a Soviet dispute with China in 1969 to destroy "a wall" at the Ussuri River, which separates Manchuria from Russia's Far East, according to the physicist. Infrared radiation is heat-producing and invisible wavelengths lying between visible light and microwave on the electromagnetic spectrum. "Near" infrared is closest to visible light and "far" or "deep" infrared is closer to microwave. Far infrared waves are thermal and cause increased molecular vibrational activity. In other words, infrared radiation is heat.
A plasmoid cloud is a heated and ionized gas that can be created and projected using far infrared thermal waves. Plasma occurs when a gas is heated so that some electrons have been separated from their atoms or molecules. Ball lightning is considered by experts to be a plasmoid phenomenon. The physicist told AFP that he believes that a plasmoid may have been projected onto the towers before the planes struck. "The planes may have had a plasmoid in front of them. Just two or three seconds before the planes hit the towers, a plasmoid on the towers would have caused the Faraday cabin effect, like a car being hit by lightning."
The Pentagon was less damaged by a similar plane crash and fire because either a plasmoid was not involved or as the physicist speculated, "the Pentagon is technically shielded and protected from plasmoids." "The thermal infrared plasmoid would have raised the heat of the building. One should examine the videos in slow motion to see exactly when the fires started.A plasmoid would have affected the computers in neighboring buildings, because the plasmoid affects computers and cannot be targeted precisely," the physicist said. If that were the case, another plasma expert says, "it seems evident that if the object [the plane] is moving at high speed in the dense lower levels of the atmosphere, the sudden collapse of the force free field and plasmoid would result in its thermal disintegration in a matter of seconds." The absence of any data from the black boxes is a further indication of the use of a plasmoid weapon, according to the physicist.
In 1991, before the Soviet military withdrew from East Germany, the GRU demonstrated for the U.S. Air Force Electronic Security Command (AFESC) the capabilities of its infrared beam weapon by reducing a ceramic plate into dust from a distance of one mile.
This display of Soviet weapon technology was meant to impress upon the U.S. Air Force "how a stealth bomber could be turned into dust in the same way," the physicist said. The physicist placed a slightly warmed plate on the floor of a kitchen in an apartment on the fifth floor, just below the roof. GRU headquarters in Weimar (DDR), where the infrared beam originated was less than one mile away on the other side of the valley and the second transmitter or reflector was 200 meters away, with no obstacles between.
An infrared beam weapons requires two sources. The TV and the oven were turned on and the TV's remote control was put in the refrigerator. The physicist left the room and watched the TV screen, which went black for a few seconds. The physicist left the apartment for a half hour to allow AFESC personnel to examine the results.
The plate had been reduced to dust that was difficult to pick up even with a vacuum cleaner, according to the physicist. "The plate was not destroyed suddenly as if hit by a bullet, rather it disintegrated in a process taking about 15 minutes."
If the WTC had been struck by a similar weapon, then it is very likely, according to the physicist, that one of the transmitters could have been placed in a high building nearby or on a moving platform such as a satellite, a plane, a helicopter, or ship, and the reflector, or second source, on a ship or across the East River.